On 12.02.2006 16:29, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > >>+struct prot_skb { >>+ atomic_t empty; >>+ struct semaphore *sem; >>+ struct sk_buff *skb; >>+}; > > please consider using mutexes instead! Thanks for the hint. As you may have guessed, the driver dates from pre-mutex times. :-) However, this structure is currently unused, anyway, so we'll just remove it and recreate it with a mutex should we need it again. Regards Tilman -- Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: [email protected] Bonn, Germany Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits. Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- References:
- Re: + isdn4linux-siemens-gigaset-drivers-common-module.patch added to -mm tree
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: + isdn4linux-siemens-gigaset-drivers-common-module.patch added to -mm tree
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 6/9] isdn4linux: Siemens Gigaset drivers - procfs interface
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.16-rc3-mm1: ISDN_DRV_GIGASET driver
- Previous by thread: Re: + isdn4linux-siemens-gigaset-drivers-common-module.patch added to -mm tree
- Next by thread: 2.6.15.4 ide-cd causes 'local unit communication failure' on NEC ND-4550A?
- Index(es):