On 12.02.2006 16:29, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
>>+struct prot_skb {
>>+ atomic_t empty;
>>+ struct semaphore *sem;
>>+ struct sk_buff *skb;
>>+};
>
> please consider using mutexes instead!
Thanks for the hint. As you may have guessed, the driver dates from
pre-mutex times. :-) However, this structure is currently unused,
anyway, so we'll just remove it and recreate it with a mutex should we
need it again.
Regards
Tilman
--
Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: [email protected]
Bonn, Germany
Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits.
Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- References:
- Re: + isdn4linux-siemens-gigaset-drivers-common-module.patch added to -mm tree
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: + isdn4linux-siemens-gigaset-drivers-common-module.patch added to -mm tree
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 6/9] isdn4linux: Siemens Gigaset drivers - procfs interface
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.16-rc3-mm1: ISDN_DRV_GIGASET driver
- Previous by thread: Re: + isdn4linux-siemens-gigaset-drivers-common-module.patch added to -mm tree
- Next by thread: 2.6.15.4 ide-cd causes 'local unit communication failure' on NEC ND-4550A?
- Index(es):
 |