On Tuesday 14 February 2006 6:24 pm, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> There may be a chance that cdrdao provides a better starting point,
> readability-wise. It seems to be simpler in what it does, and I've
> tended to have a better success rate with it than with cdrecord on
> "normal" usage. Of course, it does not (or did not) include the
> advanced usage cdrecord supports (various writing modes, multisession,
> who knows what else).
I wanna go:
./busybox cdwrite filename.iso /dev/cdrom
And:
./busybox cdwrite -e
To blank a rewriteable.
Anything else is gravy, pretty much...
> OG.
Rob
--
Never bet against the cheap plastic solution.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
