[RFC] sys_setrlimit() in 2.6.16

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



A test suite uncovered a possible bug in setrlimit(2), in 2.6.16-rc3.

A code that does
        mylimits.rlim_cur = 0;
        setrlimit(RLIMIT_CPU, &mylimits);
does not set a cpu time limit.

No signal is sent to this code when its "limit" of 0 seconds expires.
Whereas, under the 2.6.5 kernel (SuSE SLESS9) a signal was sent.

I don't see any obvious difference in sys_setrlimit() or
set_process_cpu_timer() between 2.6.5 and 2.6.16.

Is this a correction, or a bug?

Is a cpu time limit of 0 supposed to limit a task to 0 seconds, or
leave it unlimited?

-- 
Cliff Wickman
Silicon Graphics, Inc.
[email protected]
(651) 683-3824
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux