Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2006-02-13, at 13:01, Matthias Andree wrote:

You're barking up the wrong tree anyways. You're holding on to a
non-workable b,t,l approach because it's convenient on BSD and some
other systems, but it cannot be stable. The only stable identifiers I
conceive are brand,model,serial - and this is the way to get rid of the
ugly race between cdrecord -scanbus and cdrecord dev=b,t,l.

Right with the exception that it's the UID (unique id) *standard* that is
addressing this issue for other operating systems in a very reliable and
already successfull way. No need to invent something different here in particular
in the storage area.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux