On 2006-02-13, at 11:52, Martin Mares wrote:
The key failure in your reasoning is that there is no definition of "thesame device", which would be both consistent and useful.
This claim is a bit surprising since only, but the most irrelevant stuff from the
dust bin of history, doesn't define a world global unique id those days. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
- From: Martin Mares <mj@ucw.cz>
- Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
- References:
- Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
- From: "Jim Crilly" <jim@why.dont.jablowme.net>
- Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
- From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>
- Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
- From: Joerg Schilling <schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
- Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
- From: "D. Hazelton" <dhazelton@enter.net>
- Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
- From: Joerg Schilling <schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
- Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
- From: jerome lacoste <jerome.lacoste@gmail.com>
- Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
- From: Joerg Schilling <schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
- Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
- From: Martin Mares <mj@ucw.cz>
- Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
- Prev by Date: how test keypad driver in 2.6.10
- Next by Date: [patch 04/47] cris: remove unnecessary local_irq_restore()
- Previous by thread: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
- Next by thread: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
- Index(es):
![]() |