Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Avuton Olrich <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I should have realized that would happen, hopefully here's a better
> > one. Please let me know anything I can do to help.
> >
> > http://68.111.224.150:8080/~sbh/P1010031.JPG
>
> Thanks. Yes, it does look like the same bug.
argh. The fix for this oops is still languishing in David's tree.
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/timers/timer_tsc.c
+++ b/arch/i386/kernel/timers/timer_tsc.c
@@ -272,6 +272,10 @@ time_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_bl
if (val != CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE)
write_seqlock_irq(&xtime_lock);
if (!ref_freq) {
+ if (!freq->old){
+ ref_freq = freq->new;
+ goto end;
+ }
ref_freq = freq->old;
loops_per_jiffy_ref = cpu_data[freq->cpu].loops_per_jiffy;
#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -297,6 +301,7 @@ time_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_bl
#endif
}
+end:
if (val != CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE)
write_sequnlock_irq(&xtime_lock);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
