Paul Fulghum wrote:
Your patch leaves the schedule() call at the bottom of
the while loop between setting tty_closing and
setting TTY_CLOSING flag.
Nevermind. After schedule() the count is reread,
so you are right. Dropping tty_sem altogether
would work.
It is a matter of where you ultimately wish to
push the locking to BKL or tty_sem.
--
Paul Fulghum
Microgate Systems, Ltd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
