Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 1/2] add a CPU resource controller

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:03:45 +0530
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]> wrote:

> > +void cpu_rc_collect_hunger(task_t *tsk)
> > +{
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > +	if (CPU_RC_GUAR_SCALE * tsk->last_slice	/ (wait + tsk->last_slice)
> > +			< cr->guarantee / cr->rcd->numcpus)
> 					^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 					
> Debugging it a bit indicated that the division of cr->guarantee by 
> cr->rcd->numcpus in cpu_rc_collect_hunger doesn't seem to be required (since 
> LHS is not on global scale and also the class's tasks may not be running
> on other CPUs as in case 2). Removing the division rectified CPU sharing 
> anomaly I had found.
> 
> Let me know what you think of this fix!

Ah, you are right.  LHS is on per-cpu scale.
I'll apply your patch.

> --- kernel/cpu_rc.c.org	2006-02-11 08:44:38.000000000 +0530
> +++ kernel/cpu_rc.c	2006-02-13 18:34:30.000000000 +0530
> @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ void cpu_rc_collect_hunger(task_t *tsk)
>  
>  	wait = jiffies - tsk->last_activated;
>  	if (CPU_RC_GUAR_SCALE * tsk->last_slice	/ (wait + tsk->last_slice)
> -			< cr->guarantee / cr->rcd->numcpus)
> +			< cr->guarantee)
>  		cr->stat[cpu].maybe_hungry++;
>  
>  	tsk->last_activated = 0;

Thanks,

-- 
KUROSAWA, Takahiro
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux