On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 11:26:56AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:39:59AM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > diff -NurpP --minimal linux-2.6.16-rc2/drivers/char/drm/drm.h linux-2.6.16-rc2-mpf/drivers/char/drm/drm.h
> > --- linux-2.6.16-rc2/drivers/char/drm/drm.h 2006-02-07 11:52:24 +0100
> > +++ linux-2.6.16-rc2-mpf/drivers/char/drm/drm.h 2006-02-13 01:48:55 +0100
> > @@ -51,11 +51,9 @@
> > #if defined(__FreeBSD__) && defined(IN_MODULE)
> > /* Prevent name collision when including sys/ioccom.h */
> > #undef ioctl
> > -#include <sys/ioccom.h>
> > #define ioctl(a,b,c) xf86ioctl(a,b,c)
> > -#else
> > -#include <sys/ioccom.h>
> > #endif /* __FreeBSD__ && xf86ioctl */
> > +#include <sys/ioccom.h>
> > #define DRM_IOCTL_NR(n) ((n) & 0xff)
> > #define DRM_IOC_VOID IOC_VOID
> > #define DRM_IOC_READ IOC_OUT
>
> This one changes the behaviour.
hmm, yes, doesn't make much sense to remove that
dumplicate entry anyway, so I'll simply drop that
one from the patch ...
thanks a lot for the feedback!
> But do we want to have this non-linux hacks in the tree?
good question
best,
Herbert
> Bastian
>
> --
> It would be illogical to assume that all conditions remain stable.
> -- Spock, "The Enterprise Incident", stardate 5027.3
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
