Re: [PATCH 01/13] hrtimer: round up relative start time

Hi,

On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> but there is no 'old behavior' to restore to. The +1 to itimer intervals 
> caused artifacts that were hitting users and caused 2.4 -> 2.6 itimer 
> regressions, which hrtimers fixed. E.g.:
> 
>   http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3289

Ingo, please read correctly, this is mainly about interval timers, which 
my patch doesn't change. My patch only fixes the initial start time.

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 01/13] hrtimer: round up relative start time
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 01/13] hrtimer: round up relative start time
    • From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 01/13] hrtimer: round up relative start time
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 01/13] hrtimer: round up relative start time
    • From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 01/13] hrtimer: round up relative start time
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
• Next by Date: Re: kernel-2.6.16-rc2-git8 - reiserfs 3.6 - write problem !!!
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 01/13] hrtimer: round up relative start time
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 01/13] hrtimer: round up relative start time
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]