Peter Williams wrote:
Peter Williams wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
Peter Williams <[email protected]> wrote:
I don't think either of these issues warrant abandoning smpnice.
The first is highly unlikely to occur on real systems and the second
is just an example of the patch doing its job (maybe too
officiously). I don't think users would notice either on real systems.
Even if you pull it from 2.6.16 rather than upgrading it with my
patch can you please leave both in -mm?
Yes, I have done that. I currently have:
sched-restore-smpnice.patch
sched-modified-nice-support-for-smp-load-balancing.patch
sched-cleanup_task_activated.patch
sched-alter_uninterruptible_sleep_interactivity.patch
sched-make_task_noninteractive_use_sleep_type.patch
sched-dont_decrease_idle_sleep_avg.patch
sched-include_noninteractive_sleep_in_idle_detect.patch
sched-new-sched-domain-for-representing-multi-core.patch
sched-fix-group-power-for-allnodes_domains.patch
OK. Having slept on these problems I am now of the opinion that the
problems are caused by the use of NICE_TO_BIAS_PRIO(0) to set
*imbalance inside the (*imbalance < SCHED_LOAD_SCALE) if statement in
find_busiest_group(). What is happening here is that even though the
imbalance is less than one (average) task sometimes the decision is
made to move a task anyway but with the current version this decision
can be subverted in two ways: 1) if the task to be moved has a nice
value less than zero the value of *imbalance that is set will be too
small for move_tasks() to move it; and 2) if there are a number of
tasks with nice values greater than zero on the "busiest" more than
one of them may be moved as the value of *imbalance that is set may be
big enough to include more than one of these tasks.
The fix for this problem is to replace NICE_TO_BIAS_PRIO(0) with the
"average bias prio per runnable task" on "busiest". This will
(generally) result in a larger value for *imbalance in case 1. above
and a smaller one in case 2. and alleviate both problems. A patch to
apply this fix is attached.
Signed-off-by: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
Could you please add this patch to -mm so that it can be tested?
[old patch removed]
Can we pull this one, please? I've mistakenly assumed that busiest was
a run queue when it's actually a sched group. :-(
Here's a fixed version that takes into account the fact that busiest is
a group not a run queue. This patch also includes "improvements" to the
logic at the end of find_busiest_queue() to take account of the fact
that the loads are weighted. Hopefully, the comments in the code
explain these changes.
Signed-off-by: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
Because this is a more substantial change it may be advisable to wait
for comments from Ingo and Nick before including this in -mm for testing.
Peter
--
Peter Williams [email protected]
"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
-- Ambrose Bierce
Index: MM-2.6.X/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- MM-2.6.X.orig/kernel/sched.c 2006-02-13 10:23:12.000000000 +1100
+++ MM-2.6.X/kernel/sched.c 2006-02-13 11:46:41.000000000 +1100
@@ -2033,9 +2033,11 @@ find_busiest_group(struct sched_domain *
struct sched_group *busiest = NULL, *this = NULL, *group = sd->groups;
unsigned long max_load, avg_load, total_load, this_load, total_pwr;
unsigned long max_pull;
+ unsigned long avg_bias_prio, busiest_prio_bias, busiest_nr_running;
int load_idx;
max_load = this_load = total_load = total_pwr = 0;
+ busiest_prio_bias = busiest_nr_running = 0;
if (idle == NOT_IDLE)
load_idx = sd->busy_idx;
else if (idle == NEWLY_IDLE)
@@ -2047,13 +2049,16 @@ find_busiest_group(struct sched_domain *
unsigned long load;
int local_group;
int i;
+ unsigned long sum_prio_bias, sum_nr_running;
local_group = cpu_isset(this_cpu, group->cpumask);
/* Tally up the load of all CPUs in the group */
- avg_load = 0;
+ sum_prio_bias = sum_nr_running = avg_load = 0;
for_each_cpu_mask(i, group->cpumask) {
+ runqueue_t *rq = cpu_rq(i);
+
if (*sd_idle && !idle_cpu(i))
*sd_idle = 0;
@@ -2064,6 +2069,8 @@ find_busiest_group(struct sched_domain *
load = source_load(i, load_idx);
avg_load += load;
+ sum_prio_bias += rq->prio_bias;
+ sum_nr_running += rq->nr_running;
}
total_load += avg_load;
@@ -2078,6 +2085,8 @@ find_busiest_group(struct sched_domain *
} else if (avg_load > max_load) {
max_load = avg_load;
busiest = group;
+ busiest_prio_bias = sum_prio_bias;
+ busiest_nr_running = sum_nr_running;
}
group = group->next;
} while (group != sd->groups);
@@ -2111,12 +2120,25 @@ find_busiest_group(struct sched_domain *
(avg_load - this_load) * this->cpu_power)
/ SCHED_LOAD_SCALE;
- if (*imbalance < SCHED_LOAD_SCALE) {
+ /* assume that busiest_nr_running > 0 */
+ avg_bias_prio = busiest_prio_bias / busiest_nr_running;
+ /*
+ * Get rid of the scaling factor, rounding down as we divide and
+ * converting to biased load for use by move_tasks()
+ */
+ *imbalance = biased_load(*imbalance);
+ /*
+ * if *imbalance is less than the average runnable task biased prio
+ * there is no gaurantee that any tasks will be moved so we'll have
+ * a think about bumping its value to force at least one task to be
+ * moved
+ */
+ if (*imbalance < avg_bias_prio) {
unsigned long pwr_now = 0, pwr_move = 0;
unsigned long tmp;
- if (max_load - this_load >= SCHED_LOAD_SCALE*2) {
- *imbalance = NICE_TO_BIAS_PRIO(0);
+ if (biased_load(max_load - this_load) >= avg_bias_prio*2) {
+ *imbalance = avg_bias_prio;
return busiest;
}
@@ -2146,18 +2168,19 @@ find_busiest_group(struct sched_domain *
pwr_move /= SCHED_LOAD_SCALE;
/* Move if we gain throughput */
- if (pwr_move <= pwr_now)
- goto out_balanced;
+ if (pwr_move <= pwr_now) {
+ /* or if there's a reasonable chance that *imbalance
+ * is big enough to cause a move
+ */
+ if (*imbalance <= avg_bias_prio / 2)
+ goto out_balanced;
+ else
+ return busiest;
+ }
- *imbalance = NICE_TO_BIAS_PRIO(0);
- return busiest;
+ *imbalance = avg_bias_prio;
}
- /*
- * Get rid of the scaling factor, rounding down as we divide and
- * converting to biased load for use by move_tasks()
- */
- *imbalance = biased_load(*imbalance);
return busiest;
out_balanced:
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
