Re: old patches in -mm

>> > 2.6-sony_acpi4.patch
>> Forgotten, I think. This one showed no problems for me until now.
>
>The ACPI guys don't like machine-specific drivers like this, apparently -
>features are supposed to be controlled via the machine's BIOS ACPI methods.
>
>But given the state of Sony ACPI documentaion (ie: none) that might not
>work out.  I'll ask about it.
>
If they come up with a better implementation, I would be glad to
assist testing.


Jan Engelhardt
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • old patches in -mm
    • From: Xose Vazquez Perez <[email protected]>
  • Re: old patches in -mm
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
  • Re: old patches in -mm
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [WATCHDOG] sa1100_wdt.c + pcwd.c patches
• Next by Date: Re: The naming of at()s is a difficult matter
• Previous by thread: Re: old patches in -mm
• Next by thread: [git patch review 1/4] IPoIB: Don't start send-only joins while multicast thread is stopped
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]