Re: [PATCH] matroxfb: simply return what i2c_add_driver() does

Hi Arthur,

> insmod will tell us when the module failed to load. We do no further
> processing on the return from i2c_add_driver(), so just return what
> i2c_add_driver() did, instead of storing it.
> 
> Add __init/__exit annotations while we're at it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arthur Othieno <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Jean Delvare <[email protected]>

Arthur, do you have such a device yourself? I have another cleanup
patch for this driver and am looking for testers.

Thanks,
-- 
Jean Delvare
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] matroxfb: simply return what i2c_add_driver() does
    • From: [email protected] (Arthur Othieno)

• References:
  • [PATCH] matroxfb: simply return what i2c_add_driver() does
    • From: Arthur Othieno <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [BUG] reiserfs/super.c commit breaks boot process in stable and HEAD
• Next by Date: Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: ALSA - pnp OS bios option
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] matroxfb: simply return what i2c_add_driver() does
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] matroxfb: simply return what i2c_add_driver() does
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]