Re: [PATCH] updated fstatat64 support

[Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>]

> --- linux-2.6.15.i686/arch/i386/kernel/syscall_table.S-at	2006-02-06 13:11:24.000000000 -0800
> +++ linux-2.6.15.i686/arch/i386/kernel/syscall_table.S	2006-02-06 13:11:34.000000000 -0800
> @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@
>  	.long sys_mknodat
>  	.long sys_fchownat
>  	.long sys_futimesat
> -	.long sys_newfstatat		/* 300 */
> +	.long sys_fstatat64		/* 300 */
>  	.long sys_unlinkat
>  	.long sys_renameat
>  	.long sys_linkat
> --- linux-2.6.15.i686/arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S-at	2006-02-06 13:05:04.000000000 -0800
> +++ linux-2.6.15.i686/arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S	2006-02-06 13:05:21.000000000 -0800
> @@ -677,7 +677,7 @@
>  	.quad sys_mknodat
>  	.quad sys_fchownat
>  	.quad compat_sys_futimesat
> -	.quad compat_sys_newfstatat	/* 300 */
> +	.quad sys32_fstatat		/* 300 */
>  	.quad sys_unlinkat
>  	.quad sys_renameat
>  	.quad sys_linkat

So we end up with sys_newfstatat for 64 bit architectures, sys_fstatat64
for 32 bit architectures and sys32_fstatat for compat mode. Shouldn't the
name of the compat call changed to sys32_fstatat64?
At least that is how it used to be for all other *64 compat system calls
like e.g. fstat64.

Heiko
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/