Re: Fix s390 build failure.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Heiko Carstens <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 04:27:11PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > 
> > arch/s390/kernel/compat_signal.c:199: error: conflicting types for 'do_sigaction'
> > include/linux/sched.h:1115: error: previous declaration of 'do_sigaction' was here
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
> > 
> > --- linux-2.6.15.noarch/arch/s390/kernel/compat_signal.c~	2006-02-10 12:47:57.000000000 -0500
> > +++ linux-2.6.15.noarch/arch/s390/kernel/compat_signal.c	2006-02-10 12:48:05.000000000 -0500
> > @@ -196,7 +196,4 @@ sys32_sigaction(int sig, const struct ol
> >  }
> >  
> > -int
> > -do_sigaction(int sig, const struct k_sigaction *act, struct k_sigaction *oact);
> > -
> >  asmlinkage long
> >  sys32_rt_sigaction(int sig, const struct sigaction32 __user *act,
> > -
> 
> Hmm.. I sent the same patch earlier to Andrew already. To whom should I send
> simple compile fixes?

You can copy Linus - sometimes he applies things ;) If not, I'll catch it.

> Anyway, the patch s390-compat-signal-compile-fix.patch can be removed from
> the -mm tree.

That's fine - I'll autodrop it next time I sync with Linus.

I've been a bit sluggish with the s390 patches while waiting for you and
Christoph to sort things out.  I'm thinking of holding off on
s390-add-missing-validation-for-dasd-discipline-specific-ioctls.patch and
s390-cleanup-of-dasd-eer-module.patch.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux