Re: [PATCH, RFC] [1/3] Generic in-kernel AC status

On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 12:57:53PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> The included patch adds support for power management methods to register 
> callbacks in order to allow drivers to check if the system is on AC or 
> not. Following patches add support to ACPI and APM. Feedback welcome.

Ok. Maybe i am not seeing the point. But why do we need this in the kernel?
Can't we handles this easily in userspace?
-- 
Stefan Seyfried                  \ "I didn't want to write for pay. I
QA / R&D Team Mobile Devices      \ wanted to be paid for what I write."
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nürnberg \                    -- Leonard Cohen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH, RFC] [1/3] Generic in-kernel AC status
  - From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH, RFC] [1/3] Generic in-kernel AC status
  - From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.15-rt16: possible sound-related side-effect
Next by Date: Re: Taking a break from Kernel Traffic
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH, RFC] [1/3] Generic in-kernel AC status
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH, RFC] [1/3] Generic in-kernel AC status
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]