On Friday 10 February 2006 16:32, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Con Kolivas wrote:
> > Just so it's clear I understand, is this what you (both) had in mind?
> > Inline so it's not built for !CONFIG_SWAP_PREFETCH
>
> Close...
> > +inline void lru_cache_add_tail(struct page *page)
>
> Is this inline going to do what you intend?
I don't care if it's actually inlined, but the subtleties of compilers is way
beyond me. All it positively achieves is silencing the unused function
warning so I had hoped it meant that function was not built. I tend to be
wrong though...
> spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
>
> > + add_page_to_inactive_list_tail(zone, page);
>
> spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
Thanks!
Cheers,
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
