Re: Let's get rid of ide-scsi

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Let's get rid of ide-scsi
From: Joshua Kwan <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 21:35:38 -0800
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051019)

On 02/09/2006 09:24 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 07:36:14PM -0500, Wakko Warner wrote:
> 
>>I am also against the seperate USB block layer, I personally saw no use in
>>it.
> 
> 
> What "seperate USB block layer"?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

I assume he means CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UB.

-- 
Joshua Kwan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

References:
- Let's get rid of ide-scsi
  - From: Alex Davis <[email protected]>
- Re: Let's get rid of ide-scsi
  - From: Wakko Warner <[email protected]>
- Re: Let's get rid of ide-scsi
  - From: Greg KH <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] mm: Implement Swap Prefetching v23
Next by Date: OCFS2 Filesystem inconsistency across nodes
Previous by thread: Re: Let's get rid of ide-scsi
Next by thread: Re: Let's get rid of ide-scsi
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux