Re: Let's get rid of ide-scsi

On 02/09/2006 09:24 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 07:36:14PM -0500, Wakko Warner wrote:
> 
>>I am also against the seperate USB block layer, I personally saw no use in
>>it.
> 
> 
> What "seperate USB block layer"?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

I assume he means CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UB.

-- 
Joshua Kwan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

---

• References:
  • Let's get rid of ide-scsi
    • From: Alex Davis <[email protected]>
  • Re: Let's get rid of ide-scsi
    • From: Wakko Warner <[email protected]>
  • Re: Let's get rid of ide-scsi
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] mm: Implement Swap Prefetching v23
• Next by Date: OCFS2 Filesystem inconsistency across nodes
• Previous by thread: Re: Let's get rid of ide-scsi
• Next by thread: Re: Let's get rid of ide-scsi
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]