Andrew Morton wrote:
Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
Con Kolivas <[email protected]> wrote:
Ok I see. We don't have a way to add to the tail of that list though?
del_page_from_lru() + (new) add_page_to_inactive_list_tail().
Is that
a worthwhile addition to this (ever growing) project? That would definitely
have an impact on the other code if not all done within swap_prefetch.c..
which would also be quite a large open coded something.
Do both of the above in a new function in swap.c.
That'll require the caller to do lru locking.
I'd add an lru_cache_add_tail, use it instead of the current lru_cache_add
that Con's got now, and just implement it in a simple manner, without
pagevecs.
umm, that's what I said ;)
You said del_page_from_lru(), which doesn't belong in a function
called lru_cache_add_tail.
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
