Re: Terminate process that fails on a constrained allocation V3

On Thursday 09 February 2006 21:12, Christoph Lameter wrote:

> > Doing this all properly would probably get quite messy.
> 
> I'd say making overcommit working nicely with MPOL_BIND is yet another 
> fundamental issue for the policy layer but it does not matter for this 
> patch.

I agree. Your patch is ok by me, although I think the earlier 
simpler patches would have done as well (it's slightly overengineered).
But not too bad.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Terminate process that fails on a constrained allocation V3
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: Terminate process that fails on a constrained allocation V3
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: Terminate process that fails on a constrained allocation V3
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [ANNOUNCE] libhugetlbfs
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs
• Previous by thread: Re: Terminate process that fails on a constrained allocation V3
• Next by thread: Re: Terminate process that fails on a constrained allocation V3
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]