Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs

On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, Heiko Carstens wrote:

> Simply because there is no such interface on s390. The only thing we know
> for sure is that if we are running under z/VM the user is free to
> configure up to 63 additional virtual cpus on the fly...

Xen is in a similar situation.

-- 
All Rights Reversed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs
    • From: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs
    • From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs
    • From: Nathan Lynch <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs
    • From: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Linux running on a PCI Option device?
• Next by Date: Re: git for dummies, anyone?
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]