On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 05:28:31PM +0300, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> >I did this to the scheduler last year - see
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=111404726721747&w=2
> It's really interesting!
> Have you tested fairness of your solution and it's performance overhead?
What do you mean by fairness, exactly?
As for its overhead, I just got it working inside UML. I tried it on
x86_64, but something was wrong with the low-level switching stuff,
and the machine hung whenever a guest scheduler process tried to run.
So, I never got any real measurements.
I had better things to do, so I dropped this and went back to them.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
