Andrew Morton wrote:
MIke Galbraith <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 00:47 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
This was a -mm kernel - how do we know it's not -mm breakage?
It's an educated guess. I suppose it could be -mm breakage.
I sent Andrew a patch which tightens up some debug checking, and
that is likely to be causing your BUGs.
It _appears_ to be mm breakage. I just built/ran rc1 with the same
config, and it works fine.
RL is calling, so I can't dig right this minute... in a couple hours I
hope to be able to start though.
Before I get to the 'what comes next' compile marathon, any likely
candidates?
rc2-mm1?
(or Nick, do you have the supposed fix handy?)
Yeah, I'm still scratching my head over the mystery fix.
The mm/swap.c hunk from git 8519fb30e438f8088b71a94a7d5a660a814d3872
is the mystery fix (the mm.h hunk is already in there).
I suppose you'd better verify that -mm works fine with the patch as
well, when you get time.
Thanks,
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
