Re: [PATCH] fstatat64 support

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> please remove the new from the syscall name.  just sys_fstatat64

I use that to show the lineage.  We use newfstat etc for the current
generation of interfaces.  Using fstatat would be irritating IMO.

-- 
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] fstatat64 support
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] fstatat64 support
    • From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] fstatat64 support
    • From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Terminate process that fails on a constrained allocation
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] fstatat64 support
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] fstatat64 support
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]