Re: [PATCH] fstatat64 support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>, Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fstatat64 support
From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 13:04:13 -0800
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060128)

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> please remove the new from the syscall name.  just sys_fstatat64

I use that to show the lineage.  We use newfstat etc for the current
generation of interfaces.  Using fstatat would be irritating IMO.

-- 
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] fstatat64 support
  - From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] fstatat64 support
  - From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] fstatat64 support
  - From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Terminate process that fails on a constrained allocation
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] fstatat64 support
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] fstatat64 support
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux