On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 12:03 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Now I believe Eric's code so far would make it so that you can only > refer to a namespace from it's *creating* context. Still restrictive, > but seems acceptable. The same goes for filesystem namespaces. You can't see into random namespaces, just the ones underneath your own. Sounds really reasonable to me. -- Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
- Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
- From: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
- From: Sam Vilain <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
- From: Hubertus Franke <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
- From: Hubertus Franke <[email protected]>
- The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- From: Hubertus Franke <[email protected]>
- Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- From: Hubertus Franke <[email protected]>
- Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 01/03] add EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_FUTURE()
- Next by Date: Re: Terminate process that fails on a constrained allocation
- Previous by thread: Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- Next by thread: Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- Index(es):
 |