Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.

On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 12:03 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Now I believe Eric's code so far would make it so that you can only
> refer to a namespace from it's *creating* context.  Still restrictive,
> but seems acceptable.

The same goes for filesystem namespaces.  You can't see into random
namespaces, just the ones underneath your own.  Sounds really reasonable
to me.

-- Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
    • From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
  • Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
    • From: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
    • From: Sam Vilain <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
    • From: Hubertus Franke <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
    • From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
    • From: Hubertus Franke <[email protected]>
  • The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
  • Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
    • From: Hubertus Franke <[email protected]>
  • Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
  • Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
    • From: Hubertus Franke <[email protected]>
  • Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
    • From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 01/03] add EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_FUTURE()
• Next by Date: Re: Terminate process that fails on a constrained allocation
• Previous by thread: Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
• Next by thread: Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]