Quoting Hubertus Franke ([email protected]): > Eric W. Biederman wrote: > So it seems the clone( flags ) is a reasonable approach to create new > namespaces. Question is what is the initial state of each namespace? > In pidspace we know we should be creating an empty pidmap ! > In network, someone suggested creating a loopback device > In uts, create "localhost" > Are there examples where we rather inherit ? Filesystem ? Of course filesystem is already implemented, and does inheret a full copy. -serge - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
- Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
- From: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
- From: Sam Vilain <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
- From: Hubertus Franke <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
- From: Hubertus Franke <[email protected]>
- The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- From: Hubertus Franke <[email protected]>
- Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- From: Hubertus Franke <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] add execute_in_process_context() API
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] add execute_in_process_context() API
- Previous by thread: Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- Next by thread: Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- Index(es):
 |