On Wednesday 08 February 2006 09:18, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > James Bottomley <[email protected]> writes:
> >
> > In general this seems like a lot of code for a simple problem.
> > It might be simpler to just put the work structure into the parent
> > object and do the workqueue unconditionally
> >
>
> That apparently would have really bad performance problems. If we're
> !in_interrupt() we want to do the work synchronously.
It depends if it's common or not. If it's uncommon then simpler code
is better.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
