On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 05:40:13PM -0800, Chen, Kenneth W wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote on Tuesday, February 07, 2006 5:20 PM
> > You could ask the same question for NUMA:
> > Select generic system type does not mean NUMA systems are only choice I
> > can have. What's wrong with having an option that works just fine?
>
> Please read more ia64 arch specific code ...
>
> CONFIG_IA64_GENERIC is a platform type choice, you can have platform
> type of DIG, HPZX1, SGI SN2, or all of the above. DIG platform depends
> on ACPI, thus need ACPI on. SGI altix is a numa box, thus, need NUMA
> on. NEC, Fujitsu build numa machines with ACPI SRAT table, thus, need
> ACPI_NUMA on. When you build a kernel to boot on all platforms, you
> have no choice but to turn on all of the above. Processor type and SMP
> is different from platform type. It does not have any dependency on
> platform type. They are orthogonal choice.
This is interesting, considering that e.g. IA64_SGI_SN2=y, NUMA=n or
IA64_DIG=y, ACPI=n are currently allowed configurations.
> > Keith said IA64_GENERIC should select all the options required in
> > order to run on all the IA64 platforms out there.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > This is what my patch does.
>
> You patch does more than what you described and is wrong. Selecting
> platform type should not be tied into selecting SMP nor should it tied
This was what Keith wanted.
It seems everyone thinks I am wrong, but when I'm implementing what one
person suggests, other people say that what I am doing is wrong.
> with processor type, nor should it tied with ARCH_FLATMEM_ENABLE. All
> of them are orthogonal and independent.
1. NUMA on ia64 currently depends on !FLATMEM.
2. IA64_GENERIC currently select's NUMA.
3. You say IA64_GENERIC should not be tied with ARCH_FLATMEM_ENABLE.
It's impossible to fulfill all three of them.
My initial approach to fix them was to remove the select's from
IA64_GENERIC, therefore removing 2., but this patch was not accepted.
This patch adds more select's to IA64_GENERIC, therefore removing 3.,
but you disagree with it.
The last choice it to remove the dependency of NUMA on !FLATMEM... ;-)
> Theoretically and maybe academically interesting, I should be able to
> build a kernel that boots on all UP platforms, with your patch, that
> is not possible.
Theoretically and maybe academically interesting, I should be able to
build a kernel that boots on all non-NUMA platforms, currently, that is
not possible.
> - Ken
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
