Edgar Toernig wrote:
[email protected] wrote:
--- a/drivers/media/dvb/bt8xx/bt878.c
+++ b/drivers/media/dvb/bt8xx/bt878.c
@@ -381,6 +381,23 @@ bt878_device_control(struct bt878 *bt, u
EXPORT_SYMBOL(bt878_device_control);
+
+struct cards card_list[] __devinitdata = {
+
+ { 0x01010071, BTTV_BOARD_NEBULA_DIGITV, "Nebula Electronics DigiTV" },
+ { 0x07611461, BTTV_BOARD_AVDVBT_761, "AverMedia AverTV DVB-T 761" },
[...]
I'm not very familiar with the pci configuration logic but
what's the point of this list and the BTTV_BOARD_xxx defines?
The defines are never used and the list is only used to let
the probe routine fail when the device is not in the list.
Yes, that's the idea. The naming is for identification in the failed case.
Anyway, the bttv driver already has this information in his card
list (field has_dvb). As long as the bt878 isn't stand alone
and requires the bttv driver wouldn't it be better to query its
table?
This is only the interim fix for bug [5895] prior to the merge, as was
discussed on the linux-dvb and video4linux mailing lists.
Thread: [linux-dvb] Re: [Fwd: [Bug 5895] With DVB drivers enabled
snd_87x (ALSA) don't detect Broooktree audio]
Even if this table is kept, it should be static
Ack'd.
Thanks,
Manu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]