Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 11:58 +1300, Sam Vilain wrote:
> Hubertus Franke wrote:
> > The container is just an umbrella object that ties every "virtualized" 
> > subsystem together.
> 
> I like this description; it matches roughly with the concepts as
> presented by vserver; there is the process virtualisation (vx_info), and
> the network virtualisation (nx_info) of Eric's that has been integrated
> to the vserver 2.1.x development branch.  However the vx_info has become
> the de facto umbrella object space as well.  These could almost
> certainly be split out without too much pain or incurring major
> rethinks.
> 
> Sam.

How does all of this tie in with CPU Sets? It seems to me, they have
something not unlike a container already that supports nesting.

Kevin

> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux