Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation

On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Andi Kleen wrote:

> On Tuesday 07 February 2006 13:30, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > you are a bit biased towards low-latency NUMA setups i guess (read: 
> > Opterons) :-) 
> 
> Well they are the vast majority of NUMA systems Linux runs on.

The opterons are some strange mix of SMP and NUMA system. The NUMA "nodes" 
are on the same motherboard and therefore there are only small latencies 
involved. NUMA only gives small benefits.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 04/20] pspace: Allow multiple instaces of the process id namespace
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] new tty buffering locking fix
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]