Luca Berra wrote:
This, in fact is *EXACTLY* what we're talking about; it does require
autoassemble. Why do we care about the partition types at all? The
reason is that since the md superblock is at the end, it doesn't get
automatically wiped if the partition is used as a raw filesystem, and
so it's important that there is a qualifier for it.
I don't like using partition type as a qualifier, there is people who do
not wish to partition their drives, there are systems not supporting
msdos like partitions, heck even m$ is migrating away from those.
That's why we're talking about non-msdos partitioning schemes.
In any case if that has to be done it should be done into mdadm, not
in a different scrip that is going to call mdadm (behaviour should be
consistent between mdadm invoked by initramfs and mdadm invoked on a
running system).
Agreed. mdadm is the best place for it.
If the user wants to reutilize a device that was previously a member of
an md array he/she should use mdadm --zero-superblock to remove the
superblock.
I see no point in having a system that tries to compensate for users not
following correct procedures. sorry.
You don't? That surprises me... making it harder for the user to have
accidental data loss sounds like a very good thing to me.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
