On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 01:57:06AM +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 February 2006 01:28, Nick Piggin wrote:
> >
> > I'd like to hear any other suggestions though. Patch included to aid
> > discussion at this stage, rather than to encourage any rash decisions.
>
> I see the demonstrable imbalance but I was wondering if there is there a real
> world benchmark that is currently affected?
>
Other than the hackbench lock latency that Ingo believes is quite
important (and I wouldn't disagree at all if it turns out to be a
regression), I have not had much time to test things out. I don't
think we can chance it in the SUSE kernel.
The other thing is that it causes headaches when trying to analyse
and review proposed scheduler changes (eg. Suresh's power saving
work).
Nick
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
