Re: RFC: add an ADVANCED_USER option

[Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>]

On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 03:05:52PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> 
> > What we could do is to add an additional ADVANCED_USER option that
> > hides options like VMSPLIT or the NAPI options for net drivers.
> 
> > config ADVANCED_USER
> > 	bool "ask questions that require a deeper knowledge of the kernel"
> 
> > config EXPERIMENTAL
> > 	bool "Prompt for development and/or incomplete code/drivers"
> > 	depends on ADVANCED_USER
> 
> Shouldn't this be the other way around, i.e. ADVANCED_USER depending
> on EXPERIMENTAL?

No, if there's a dependency between the two, then in this direction.

> If you implement it as above, people will set ADVANCED_USER to "n" in
> oldconfig and then be surprised that all experimental drivers are
> gone.

What about no dependency between ADVANCED_USER and EXPERIMENTAL?

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/