Re: [PATCH] compat: add compat functions for *at syscalls

On Tuesday 07 February 2006 09:43, David S. Miller wrote:

> 
> The alternative suggestions get less and less efficient :-) My whole
> desire is to optimize this as much as possible, without the overhead
> of an extra stack frame or "is_compat_task()" kinds of runtime tests.

My impression is you're doing a lot of ugly code here just to 
work around some pecularity of the sparc gcc. 

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] compat: add compat functions for *at syscalls
  - From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] compat: add compat functions for *at syscalls
  - From: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] compat: add compat functions for *at syscalls
  - From: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] compat: add compat functions for *at syscalls
  - From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/20] Multiple instances of the process id namespace
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] compat: add compat functions for *at syscalls
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] compat: add compat functions for *at syscalls
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]