Re: [PATCH] compat: add compat functions for *at syscalls

On Tuesday 07 February 2006 09:43, David S. Miller wrote:

> 
> The alternative suggestions get less and less efficient :-) My whole
> desire is to optimize this as much as possible, without the overhead
> of an extra stack frame or "is_compat_task()" kinds of runtime tests.

My impression is you're doing a lot of ugly code here just to 
work around some pecularity of the sparc gcc. 

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] compat: add compat functions for *at syscalls
    • From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] compat: add compat functions for *at syscalls
    • From: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] compat: add compat functions for *at syscalls
    • From: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] compat: add compat functions for *at syscalls
    • From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/20] Multiple instances of the process id namespace
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] compat: add compat functions for *at syscalls
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] compat: add compat functions for *at syscalls
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]