Re: [RFC][PATCH] unify pfn_to_page [25/25] sparc64 pfn_to_page/page_to_pfn

David S. Miller wrote:

We did not want these inlined on sparc64 for a good reason.
The pointer arithmatic gets expanded to many additions,
subtractions, and shifts, and I felt it too much to inline.

Okay.

If you want to consolidate all of the implementations, that's
fine, but please keep the option of not inlining these two
routines.

I'll do (and CC to each arch's maintainer in next post)

Thanks,
-- Kame


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [RFC][PATCH] unify pfn_to_page [25/25] sparc64 pfn_to_page/page_to_pfn
    • From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] unify pfn_to_page [25/25] sparc64 pfn_to_page/page_to_pfn
    • From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] compat: add compat functions for *at syscalls
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] unify pfn_to_page [25/25] sparc64 pfn_to_page/page_to_pfn
• Next by thread: CLAIM WINNING PRIZE
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]