Kirill Korotaev wrote: >> How do we want to create the container? >> In our patch we did it through a /proc/container filesystem. >> Which created the container object and then on fork/exec switched over. > > this doesn't look good for a full virtualization solution, since proc > should be virtualized as well :) Well, /proc should be "virtualized" or "isolated", how do you expect a container to work correctly ? plenty of user space tools depend on it. C. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
- From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
- References:
- [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
- From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
- From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
- From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
- From: Hubertus Franke <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
- From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
- [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
- Prev by Date: Re: [git patch review 2/2] IB: Don't doublefree pages from scatterlist
- Next by Date: network delays, mysterious push packets
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
- Index(es):
 |