On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 02:19 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > That you placed the namespaces in a separate structure from > task_struct. > That part seems completely unnecessary, that and the addition of a > global id in a completely new namespace that will be a pain to > virtualize > when it's time comes. Could you explain a bit why the container ID would need to be virtualized? -- Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
- References:
- [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
- From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
- From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
- From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.16-rc1-mm2 pata driver confusion
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
- Index(es):
 |