I'm confused about where software has inherited a sense of morality from?
Equally, as I can't see any restriction of the GPL in that link I
don't get the reference. What it's essentially saying to me is 'if
you don't want it under the GPL licence terms, talk to the copyright
holder(s) or their authorised representative about alternatives'.
Plenty of people are happy to dual licence their work, & TBH I'd
rather see people do that and get something for their work than have
it misappropriated into commercial software and have to look to the
courts for a slim chance at compensation...
Anyone else rather get back to the technical discussion or is it just me?
On 06/02/06, Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> wrote:
> Luke-Jr <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > ProDVD is immoral software. I use growisofs.
>
> growisofs is immoral, see
>
> http://fy.chalmers.se/~appro/linux/DVD+RW/solaris.com.html
>
> Either this, or the GPL applies, but not both as intended by the author....
>
> Jörg
>
> --
> EMail:[email protected] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
> [email protected] (uni)
> [email protected] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
> URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
