Re: Wanted: hotfixes for -mm kernels

[Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>]

On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 10:09:59AM +0100, Marc Koschewski wrote:
> * Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> [2006-02-04 21:41:39 +0100]:
> > On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 07:57:39PM +0100, Marc Koschewski wrote:
>...
> > > We talked about hotfixes for -mm. So why not check these into the -mm-git tree
> > > then? This would make sense and would conform fully to my understanding of what
> > > the -mm-git tree should be. I don't want to select 23 patches from LKML to make
> > > the tree compile or work. I want to checkout. Why make it easy when you may get
> > > it difficult.
> > >...
> > > What sense does an -mm tree make when there are people that cannot test it because of
> > > known bugs that lead to the -mm tree not being bootable or - even worse - destroying
> > > the system?
> > 
> > That's exactly what Andrew does now implement through the hot-fixes
> > directory [1].
>...
> Moreover, just _one_ more thing which is most important at least to me:
> If one can do a checkout on a daily basis with let's say 3 new patches checked
> in, one can test these. The other day there are maybe another 2 new patches
> applied which are to be tested. This would just speed up the testing cycle
> whereas a 3 MB patch with tons of fixes and testing is just like a kick-down
> with the hand-brake pulled. Sometimes I#M really overwhelmed by how many patches
> came in with the recent -mm. ACPI, ALSA, VM, various FS stuff, ... It's quite
> impossible to me to really test the patches in an effective manner due to having
> my 2 eyes focussed on too many things at one. I do test ALSA with various types
> of in/out operation while my reiserfs partition is on the way to hell. To me
> that doesn't sound like effective testing.
> 
> This is just about testing and debugging time effectiveness and not about some
> religious thing a la SCM vs. patches.

Hotfixes are something that can be done.

What you suggest is not really possible.

Your thinko is:
3 new patches a day don't sum up to 3 MB after one week.

As far as I understand it, the big work for Andrew is integrating two 
dozen git repositories and at about thousand patches in a way that:
- everything applies
- the kernel compiles on several architectures
- the kernel actually runs on some machines

Andrew does all this before he releases an -mm kernel (I know due to the 
feedback he sometimes gives for patches I sent), and this is the sole 
reason why most -mm kernels are half-way usable.

Some random snapshot from Andrew's repository wouldn't help anyone, 
either it's good enough that he releases an -mm kernel or it isn't worth 
other people testing it.

> Marc

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/