On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 11:30:30 +0100, Helge Hafting said: > This can't legally happen. Do the DMCA prevent "circumventing" > even when you have the legal right to make copies of the content? As a matter of fact, yes. See 17 USC 1201 and Skylarov v. Adobe - the fact that a user may have totally legitimate fair-use access to the protected content is *not* an exemption to the DMCA's anti-circumvention clause. > (If so, then the music industry breaks DMCA when manufacturing > their protected CDs from a protected master . . .) Oohh.. an interesting point.. ;)
Attachment:
pgpLnWGj3qfq6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- From: Thomas Horsten <thomas@horsten.com>
- Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- From: Karim Yaghmour <karim@opersys.com>
- Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@gmail.com>
- Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- From: Filip Brcic <brcha@users.sourceforge.net>
- Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- From: Karim Yaghmour <karim@opersys.com>
- Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- From: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@drzeus.cx>
- Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- From: egallego@babel.ls.fi.upm.es (Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias)
- Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- From: Helge Hafting <helge.hafting@aitel.hist.no>
- Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- Prev by Date: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Linux Kernel Useful Patches (2.4)
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.16 serious consequences / GPL_EXPORT_SYMBOL / USB drivers of major vendor excluded
- Previous by thread: Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- Next by thread: Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- Index(es):
![]() |