unexport lookup_hash

[Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>]

I just stumbled across this whilst checking for planned feature removal,
and missed any discussion why this didn't happen, so I assume Christoph forgot.

Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>

--- linux-2.6.15.noarch/fs/namei.c~	2006-02-03 16:20:49.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.15.noarch/fs/namei.c	2006-02-03 16:21:07.000000000 -0500
@@ -2668,7 +2668,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(follow_up);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_write_access); /* binfmt_aout */
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(getname);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(lock_rename);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(lookup_hash);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(lookup_one_len);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(page_follow_link_light);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(page_put_link);
--- linux-2.6.15.noarch/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt~	2006-02-03 16:21:11.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.15.noarch/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt	2006-02-03 16:21:40.000000000 -0500
@@ -116,13 +116,6 @@ Who:	Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org
 
 ---------------------------
 
-What:	EXPORT_SYMBOL(lookup_hash)
-When:	January 2006
-Why:	Too low-level interface.  Use lookup_one_len or lookup_create instead.
-Who:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
----------------------------
-
 What:	CONFIG_FORCED_INLINING
 When:	June 2006
 Why:	Config option is there to see if gcc is good enough. (in january
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/