On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 21:08:23 +0100 (CET)
Mikulas Patocka <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> This fixes a small bug in is_valid_ether_addr --- for address in the form
> FF:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx it returns true. The comment is about FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF
> is not true, is_multicast_ether_addr doesn't accept FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF as
> multicast (as you can see few lines above).
>
> Mikulas
>
> --- include/linux/etherdevice.h_ 2006-02-03 21:05:23.000000000 +0100
> +++ include/linux/etherdevice.h 2006-02-03 21:05:59.000000000 +0100
> @@ -91,9 +91,7 @@
> */
> static inline int is_valid_ether_addr(const u8 *addr)
> {
> - /* FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF is a multicast address so we don't need to
> - * explicitly check for it here. */
> - return !is_multicast_ether_addr(addr) && !is_zero_ether_addr(addr);
> + return !(addr[0] & 1) && !is_zero_ether_addr(addr);
> }
>
> /**
It has already been fixed in 2.6.16 is_multicast_addr is now:
static inline int is_multicast_ether_addr(const u8 *addr)
{
return (0x01 & addr[0]);
}
--
Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
OSDL http://developer.osdl.org/~shemminger
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
