Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 03 February 2006 00:35, David Schwartz wrote:
> 	I have no idea what you mean by the "GPL's license". If it's contained in
> the GPL, it's part of the GPL. The GPL is all of a piece.

 "Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies
 of this license document, but changing it is not allowed."

Those two lines look like a copyright license for the GPL. It makes sense
for the GPL to be licensed under the GPL, but it's less than obvious to
me that that is actually the case.

Andrew Wade
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux