On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 12:35 +0100, Andy Wingo wrote: > On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 23:43 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > + spin_lock(&dev_list_lock); > > Stupid question: are you sure that something coming from an interrupt > handler won't try to grab this lock? For example from a cable unplug? Yes, I'm pretty sure (but I hope some of the firewire experts will chime in) -- but if you unplug or anything the node only goes into 'limbo' and afaict if it is ever cleaned up then that comes from a thread context. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC 4/4] firewire: add mem1394
- From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 4/4] firewire: add mem1394
- References:
- [RFC 0/4] firewire: interface to remote memory (mem1394)
- From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
- [RFC 4/4] firewire: add mem1394
- From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 4/4] firewire: add mem1394
- From: Andy Wingo <[email protected]>
- [RFC 0/4] firewire: interface to remote memory (mem1394)
- Prev by Date: Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
- Next by Date: Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC 4/4] firewire: add mem1394
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC 4/4] firewire: add mem1394
- Index(es):