Re: Size-128 slab leak — Linux Kernel

Pekka Enberg wrote:

We already have last caller in dbg_userword. Manfred, is there a
reason we're not using it?

IIRC only due to historical reasons: dbg_userword is newer than this patch.

--
   Manfred
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Size-128 slab leak
  - From: "Kevin O'Connor" <[email protected]>
- Re: Size-128 slab leak
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: Size-128 slab leak
  - From: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Recursive chmod/chown OOM kills box with 32MB RAM
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Introduce __iowrite32_copy
Previous by thread: Re: Size-128 slab leak
Next by thread: Re: Size-128 slab leak
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]