Re: Size-128 slab leak

Pekka Enberg wrote:

We already have last caller in dbg_userword. Manfred, is there a
reason we're not using it?

IIRC only due to historical reasons: dbg_userword is newer than this patch.

--
   Manfred
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Size-128 slab leak
    • From: "Kevin O'Connor" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Size-128 slab leak
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: Size-128 slab leak
    • From: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Recursive chmod/chown OOM kills box with 32MB RAM
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Introduce __iowrite32_copy
• Previous by thread: Re: Size-128 slab leak
• Next by thread: Re: Size-128 slab leak
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]