Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency

["David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>]

From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 21:42:14 +1100

> OK this is definitely broken.  We should never touch the dst lock in
> softirq context.  Since inet6_destroy_sock may be called from that
> context due to the asynchronous nature of sockets, we can't take the
> lock there.
> 
> In fact this sk_dst_reset is totally redundant since all IPv6 sockets
> use inet_sock_destruct as their socket destructor which always cleans
> up the dst anyway.  So the solution is to simply remove the call.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>

Looks good, applied, thanks Herbert.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/