[PATCH] Style Fix in __constant_test_bit for S390, remove one set of ( )

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Right now in __constant_test_bit for the s390 there is an extra set of
() surrounding the calculation.  Putting it all on one line it could
read like

return (( ((volatile char *) addr) [(nr^(__BITOPS_WORDSIZE-8))>>3] & (1<<(nr&7)) )) != 0;

This patch simply removes one set of () that is surrounding the whole

Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <[email protected]>
 bitops.h |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- linux-
+++ linux-
@@ -518,8 +518,8 @@ static inline int __test_bit(unsigned lo
 static inline int 
 __constant_test_bit(unsigned long nr, const volatile unsigned long *addr) {
-    return ((((volatile char *) addr)
-	    [(nr^(__BITOPS_WORDSIZE-8))>>3] & (1<<(nr&7)))) != 0;
+    return (((volatile char *) addr)
+	    [(nr^(__BITOPS_WORDSIZE-8))>>3] & (1<<(nr&7))) != 0;
 #define test_bit(nr,addr) \

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux