On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 10:49:51AM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Russell King wrote:
> >In short, it's defined to be whatever AT91_MCI_TRTYP_MULTIPLE means in
> >the AT91RM9200 MMC host driver, which appears to be set for any of the
> >multiple block commands. They currently are doing:
>
> That's a bit fuzzy and bound to give problems. Why not settle for the
> first case and change their code to check the block count in the
> request?
Mainly because I don't know if that's sufficient, and until I get around
to finding and reading the AT91RM9200 data sheet, I won't know if it is.
What I do know is that the addition of that flag provides the exact
information which the driver wants.
> >and using that as a lookup table by command for the value to put into
> >the command register. I want to eliminate that, and not passing the
> >MULTI flag prevents elimination of this table.
>
> Seems to be a common theme in the more recent drivers. Don't they teach
> people proper layering in the schools anymore? :)
>From the evidence to date, it would appear not.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
