Re: [patch 41/44] make thread_info.flags an unsigned long

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 10:17:43AM -0800, Luck, Tony wrote:
>  
> --- 2.6-git.orig/include/asm-ia64/thread_info.h
> +++ 2.6-git/include/asm-ia64/thread_info.h
> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
>  struct thread_info {
>  	struct task_struct *task;	/* XXX not really needed, except for dup_task_struct() */
>  	struct exec_domain *exec_domain;/* execution domain */
> -	__u32 flags;			/* thread_info flags (see TIF_*) */
> +	unsigned long flags;		/* thread_info flags (see TIF_*) */
>  	__u32 cpu;			/* current CPU */
>  	mm_segment_t addr_limit;	/* user-level address space limit */
>  	int preempt_count;		/* 0=premptable, <0=BUG; will also serve as bh-counter */
> 
> This leaves a useless hole in the structure.  Tell me again why
> this is a good thing?

This patch stops warning message introduced by the "[patch 25/44]
ia64: use generic bitops" which replaces __set_bit() family to
generic one.

But I realize that I can't replace to generic one for ia64.
Because __set_bit() family are using the pointer to __u32, but
generic __set_bit() family are using the pointer to unsigned long.

So the patch 25/44 is wrong and the change above is unnessesary.
Thanks
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux